When aiming to reduce stigma in your programme, you will not be able to do everything!

You’ll need to prioritise what you want to address in your stigma reduction aims and prioritise your final proposed approaches in your theory of change.

There are various tools and approaches to help with this process: one approach is to consider the feasibility and likely impact of your approaches and costs. Source: NNN Think about these three key areas:

How likely is it that your planned approach will have an impact on your stigma reduction aims?

How feasible will it be to implement the approach? Issues to consider could include timescale available to implement the activities, leadership, and human resources and skills.

What is the likely cost? What is the level of funding available? Of course, you may find ways of reducing costs. For example, in the Ghana Somubi Dwumadie (Ghana Participation Programme), some of the costs of community radio broadcasting were made available free of charge by engaging with traditional leaders.

Illustration showing a woman sitting at a desk working on a laptop. She's wearing a bright orange gown and headscarf.

Example: prioritisation exercise

Below is an example of a prioritisation exercise when deciding approaches to address stigma at a family level, for a child disability project in Ghana. The two options considered in the example are:

  1. Home visits with inclusion champions and home educators, and/or
  2. Mass media in targeting stigma at the family level

Of course, it’s important to remember that addressing stigma is rarely a standalone activity. For example, during a home visit, other activities are likely to be conducted an important consideration.

There may be no ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ choice, but a balance of approaches that depends on the these different factors, and also reflecting on what is likely to be offer greater sustainability.

Approach 1: Outreach home visits

Target audience: Family of a child with a disability

  • Level of impact: High

  • Feasibility: Medium
    (OPD active in target area; home educators to source)

  • Budget: Medium
    (transport costs higher in rural areas; inclusion champion/teacher stipends to consider)

Approach 2: Community radio

Target audience: Family and community members

  • Level of impact: Low

  • Feasibility: High
    (widespread use of radio in the rural context)

  • Budget: Low
    (Build in some costs for training of media staff)